TP-027, Jerry Garcia / David Grisman wins a Writer's Choice Award from Myles Astor of Positive Feedback Online

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Cyrano

Pages: [1] 2
1
Tape Tech / Re: Help with sourcing part for PR99
« on: August 05, 2010, 02:50:36 AM »

Hi,

Those blue epoxy dipped caps are mulilayer ceramic, Siemens patent Sibatit 50/63V CCLS.  Some kind of transistion technology between plate and mono MLCC.  Could not find more specs to share.  Epcos    B37981 looks close.

Andrew

2
Tape Tech / Re: Help with sourcing part for PR99
« on: May 15, 2010, 07:43:43 AM »
Thank you, I am awaiting moderator's answer.

Andrew

3
Tape Tech / Re: Possible replacement for 5532 opamp?
« on: April 30, 2010, 12:01:08 PM »
Oh yeh  145MHz 180v/uS this is wide and high.
And it is not internally compensated so all those caramic 150pF/47pF caps will stay (PR99 just input board) or will have to added on other boards. 
What is important is that it needs (datasheet) local PS decaupling and quite high 4u7 on each rail.  If you missed that It will make it sound more pronouced and snappier and thinner, this AD chip has a tad of BB house sound.  So that works for us in this case, but at the expense of distortions.

I went up to AD843 34MHz which likes ~2uF of decaupling and it makes substantial difference in distortions and percived fullness of sound just by ear. 
AD843 is internally compensated so half what studer lists in comp. pF loops is good to keep it stable, (never had any problems here) and extends bandwidth over 100kHz.  I settled on AD823/AD8610/AD843 mix across different boards.  That RC4559 is a w@#e to sub.


AD8620/8610 was in your hands?  It has a nerve and snap, quite close to RC but more refined.

Best
ANdrew

4
Tape Tech / Re: Possible replacement for 5532 opamp?
« on: April 29, 2010, 07:49:38 AM »
Hi Tod,

Does AD8066 preserve vocal qualities of RC4559 in your testing?  No other changes but IC swap?  This is very good result a must try!

Best
ANdrew

5
Tape Tech / Re: Help with sourcing part for PR99
« on: April 29, 2010, 04:12:11 AM »
Keith,

It is a cap, either monolitic or layered ceramic.  Something like that:
http://uk.farnell.com/epcos/b37986g5103j/capacitor-10nf-50v/dp/4001254

Studer had used 2 types I could spot so far, the one like that on the link and the other one which is taller and it seems to be ceramic disc encased in the same type of epoxy, you can see from the top of this cap a sandwiche structure.  No other marking than capacity and S for tol or voltage.  They are also used in FB loop on record PCB HS IEC (330pF) instead of regular plate ceramic.
 They have certain tonality like EMZ KP adding slight rounded compression to the lower freq. with open and forward full lower midrange and fatter hights.  Jumpy energetic sound with a touch of wetness in proper application.

Andrew

6
Tape Tech / Re: Help with sourcing part for PR99
« on: April 20, 2010, 07:35:15 AM »
I will give it a try!  68nF

Andrew

7
Tape Tech / Help with sourcing part for PR99
« on: April 12, 2010, 07:10:29 AM »
Hi,

Anyone could help me with getting part or specs for blue dipped 68n cap, it's C4 on power supply PCB and C1 on repro PCB.  It is used in a few other places where power pulse is an issue.  Not much info in service manuał as to its type/make and I really like what it does.

Thank you
ANdrew

8
Reel to Reel Tape Machines / Re: SonoruS modified reVox PR99 /B77
« on: August 14, 2009, 12:36:17 PM »
Arian,

I was surprised that they did so many variants of local decoupling.  I posted here the comment that when moding PS this is a hard part to deal with as any change affects different boards in a different way.  I must say this is very crucial redesign work you undertook. 

I cant calculate snubers like that but I did try different values of the local decoupling caps with very poor results, when just moving from 100u to 220u capacitance change, the sound was getting local cap sound signature overpowering the mains, and the main PS is the place where I could put some really better and therefore larger in size caps.  So I decided to go for a merge of certain caps sound qualities i just could not distribute locally with maxed out PS configuration.  I put during the development so many variants of caps in PS with a goal to standardize on only one type of cap on PCB local decoupling to get it right and it worked. 

I am left with Record amp being totally dependent on the mains.  Can you drop me a msg with options to obtain RC network configuration and values from you.  I drifted from Revox original parts too far so types of parts I would have to select to fit existing sound frame.

Regards
ANdrew 

9
Reel to Reel Tape Machines / Re: SonoruS modified reVox PR99 /B77
« on: August 05, 2009, 09:01:28 PM »
Hi,

Could you share more details regarding the power supply being buffered so that the ground signal no longer passes through the audio circuit (all PCBs have their own return loops in star rather than the common bus?).  I am trying to understand the concept, any links to applied technique to read about will be appreciated!

Best
ANdrew

10
Tape Tech / Re: PR99 repro amp LC filters
« on: August 05, 2009, 05:51:37 PM »
Tim,

I found the answer to my concerns.  I have got curious and had to look no further than PR99 MKII prior PCB version .82. 
They had omitted LC filter  and in addition  RC low pass filter 10n with load resistor change from 470 to 390 ohm.  Your suggestion might be more than to try, it will work straight.

Regards
ANdrew

11
Tape Tech / Re: PR99 repro amp LC filters
« on: July 23, 2009, 01:19:51 AM »
Tim,

That part I got, there is for that reason to cut off possible leaks from generator.  I was thinking about LC removal impact on the remaining parts on follow up circuits nothing else.  They could put it in front of that last stage too.

The other good news is that RTE I had on hand was used but most likely not for long enough so after 3 days it settled in and it is a keeper, it is worthwhile upgrade.   
Thank you for clear description of what LC was used for.  Mundorf Silver in Oil in PS opens up sound so much that mica in question became annoying limitation.  I will definitely come up with more questions!   

Best
Andrew
   

12
Tape Tech / Re: PR99 repro amp LC filters
« on: July 22, 2009, 08:43:09 PM »
Tim,

I would have to calculate created by removal of the LC parts low pass filter (1k/3n3 & 470R/10n) in both positions, this might proof to be unnecessary hustle, designers tend to cut the cost after all for us.  This output is driving phono amp, output amp and Monitor out being about anything and does it at the same time, there must be many reasons for this filter. 
Anyway have you got good results?

Andrew 

13
Tape Tech / PR99 repro amp LC filters
« on: July 21, 2009, 05:01:03 PM »
Hi,

For those in EE field, is there any reason to stick only with ceramics caps in LC filters (2.2mH/560pF).  Caps are rated at 20% with no requirements for temp stability other than mica standard. 
I tried RTE and they are sounding a bit plasticky/wooly in comparison to micas, but those micas have grain in midrange plus they sound less HF extended to start with, LF are very good.  When adding tiny styrene (20pF) on top of existing mica 560pF it creates unprecedented transparency and it makes mid-low frequencies sound 'gone' they are so rounded that almost unreal, vocals are hanging in the air effect without a trace of any color, detached from distortions and with hights just impossible to match.  And the same time low-midrange is less developed to my liking  SO I have got hooked again :-) 
I am looking for some suggestions.  Is there any alternative worth exploring?  I will experiment with different bypass ratios as this might be a key for proper balance but where to get those pesky old micas of good quality from?  Any particular brand Studer liked and used? Thanks again for sharing your experience.  It all started with adding Murdorf silver-oil to power supply, the usual atomic fall out, it was supposed to be just to see how they would do, now I need to do better.

Andrew     

14
Tape Tech / Re: Resistors used in PR99
« on: June 26, 2009, 11:10:06 PM »
Ken,

This is never ending story and you know well what I mean.
I went over so many different caps in power supply/decoupling that it became in fact more and more apparent to me that this is the key in Revox design.  I have been eyeballing thier other pro designes wishing to grab some ideas but there is no way, this is one way street.  The objective in my case was the noise and distortions and resolution together and while it is no brainer to swap those OK Philips signal caps with nice BG/N you are getting straight into the trap, you are loosing the meat obtaining in return uninvolving texture-less with twisted dynamics sound.  Attack/decay are so off and the weight behind the notes is so pale that you have no other option that proceed deeper and deeper hehe.  So this innocent logical step hey lets swap those old and dry caps is very deceiving, particularly in multistage device like this deck.  I have found all caps to hold perfect BTW.  But like you have said and emphasized a few times the grain, that is the most funky part.  You change one cap and disaster strikes 'the grain is roaring'.  Well you wait wait and it is not going away until to tackle the supply gang, the end of story.  I tried usual suspects and BG has won hands down, but you know that you dont know how it will go until you have tried all options before you are sure.  You never know what is the source of the problem, the better cap or remaining ones maybe combination, go figure.  So it takes time and money at the end but it can be done.  While I was lucky with tantalum resistors as a replacement, the most pesky in fact are mica pF range comp caps.  What they have used is grain and nothing but the grain generator, but they bring authority and a kick hard to get from very limited offering at present.  20pF-200pF is available as styrene and some silver mica (mostly guitar blend) and russian monsters.  Silver mica like CDM available all over the web could not cut it, they were too electronic with a grain but otherwise with good dynamics and drive, good styrene are very hard to get unless you like thin super thin sound of industrial sort.  I have got tons Philips/Rohm/Noble/TRW/ etc  but only Mial NOS 600V worked very well.  There is also very very good Russian silver-mica but only in 120pF 350V  (good for 150pF and 100pF spots) difficult to mount but superb.  The rest nF is RTX and RTE, they work fine.  In all cases what you have to watch out for is a constant sanitation of the sound, every time you go for better cap you will loose some harmonics and fatness of the sound and this is why I had to deal with resistors and use PIO caps in power supply (remember these are vintage PC PP MMK PEPT caps replaced with styrene).  Opamps are the simplest, there is only a handfull to try and you would prefer to use the same type all over the boards of course.  Their sound is very distinct you would know in 1 minute which way to go /love and hate.  You will never go back. 
Repro decoupling I think is good,  each stage has in close proximity sufficient storage.  Don't forget about C1 , it is a key to the sound, you don't need more than 68n but the best you can afford.  Because of the distance it feeds output amp too..  BG/FK sound better than BG/N for 22uF and 100uF local decoupling in my tests.  For 4.7uF i used BG/N.  Cerafine caps are unbearably thin sounding, FM will about match what is already there less grain.  Ground planes on the cross connect board are quite thoughfull to better overall delivery considering local decoupling.  You know you could mod it to use tube stage?   

Best
Andrew

15
Tape Tech / Re: Resistors used in PR99
« on: June 25, 2009, 07:16:08 PM »
Ken,

Thank you for sharing your experience, it is tremendous work hardly documented but well worth it.  I have not tried Vishay S102.  I went for Shinkoh and AudioNote resistors, the cost of S102 is prohibitive.  I have to admit I was not aware how different sound have original but different resistors, If I only knew that light blue are so different from others I would keep them.  Initially I tried brown and burgundy in other circuitry so my conclusion was wrong.  Now after going through the process I can see how they selected resistors, they used different set for power delivery and different set for EQ and signal and because power delivery is unique and different per each PCB now it makes sense to me.  I have PR99MKIII and different PCB have different sets of resistors, I assumed they are of the same 'house sound' after trying values which I could directly swap somewhere else to evaluate their sonic attributes, bad luck that those values where of those colours.   
But Shinkoh/AN are so wonderfull that no harm done here, however /and it was for good/ it forced me to research Opamps and redo power supply as I guess you had to do to hide now noticeable distortions and correct overall balance.  I used for signal BG/N and for local power decoupling BG/FK, I would say nothing else could do it at all.  Power supply is very hard to mod as space is limited and you have to be creative, I settled down with exact mirrored stack of PIO/SilverMica/Styrene in place of 2200uF and 68nF, the raw capacitor is Nippon ChemiCon SMH 2200/160V and Cadj is BG/N with K72 Russian teflon.  Quite a few but they fit.  Bridge I replaced with MUR860 (other faster/newer were not even close). 
Power delivery to different boards is quite interesting, C1 on repro amp is a good example, little guy (68n stack mica) of profound impact on everything coming out from this deck except recorded tape.  It took me a while to realize its role on repro and output amp boards. 

I am sure you have quite a story after going over.  Farnell sells light blue vishay, they are complementary to Shinkoh/AN in my version and cost dimes and of course they are happy in power delivery across all boards.  S102 I will try for head compensation.  Thanks for the tip.

ANdrew     

Pages: [1] 2